Why
do you say that ?
Well,
i see a bit of a documentary « do you trust this computer ? »
(http://doyoutrustthiscomputer.org/)[sorry, i really don't have any money so i really can't pay to
watch that] and in the extract, there was a man telling that AI
could know you better than your mother. The man saying that didn't
have six years old but maybe sixty can't remember,
doesn't matter but I must say that it's not difficult to know me
better than my mother cause my mother is dead now and just before
she was in a severe depression for years and maybe since the day i
was born but maybe it was the depression of my father that eated
her, of course, i'm kidding, but that's why i affirm the reaction
towards AI says more about the personn who reacts than about AI.
That man thinks his mother knows him very well, maybe he's right,
maybe he's wrong but he could not generalize this personnal
knowledge to everyone cause otherwise it's ideology...
Well,
I understand that. For example, when DESCARTES had said that we need
to be « maitre et possesseur de la nature » that is
really absurd as a project but DESCARTES said it in a cultural
context where people talked about « Mother Nature », so
if we point the cursor correctly, we understand that DESCARTES
wanting to be « maitre et possesseur » of Mother Nature,
so I bet DESCARTES wanted to be « maitre et possesseur »
of his own mother.
HAHAHAHAHA !
I
don't get it. Why should DESCARTES have wanted such a thing ?
He
wanted to copy Oedipe maybe ...
Well,
as long as I know, for a lot of men, their mothers exercise a kind
of erotic dictatorship on their life. DESCARTES was looking a way to
be free as a personn.
So,
what ? Nature is not a mother ?
There's
male and female in the Nature, i can't see the point. And I'm part
of the nature a soon i'm born.
OK,
so that man in that documentary should have said that AI would be
able to know you better than yourself, that's it ?
Well,
« connais-toi toi-même » is the big aim of philosophy
according Socrate or Platon or one of those ancients greeks wearing
a white sheet for a costume.. blabla so, it's not new and it's a
hard job …
So,
AI could be a mirror.
That's
what i'm talking about, a mirror in which humans look at their face.
Well,
some people know things about AI. They could talk about it without
talking about themselves.
Yeah,
of course. But human being is still unknown even if some try to
believe they know everything about in order to control the
situation(s) and the people...
I
understand that humanity doesn't need AI to be destroyed cause
humans are already very good in it. If AI could destroy humanity,
it's just because humans already do it.
But
AI will be more efficiant in that, also ...
HAHAHAHAHA !
So,
what ? AI and humans form already a block chain. That's it ?
Maybe.
But you have to consider that human is not a manufactured good.
We're equal but we're not the same. There's something unknown and
deeply unknown for each one. It could be burried but it's still
there.
Like
that thing in the KUBRICK movie you re-saw recently ?
HAHAHAHAHA !
I
guess your question is « does AI a different intelligence that
the human one ? »
Yeah.
AI is quicker, larger, deeper but as the image of the human one.
And
guess who does the human to its image ?
Come
on ...
HAHAHAHAHA !
OK,
« is there differents humans intelligences ? Or is it
just different forms of the same thing ? »
this
question is better.
We're
agree.
Youpi !
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire